Legal Opinion

St. Francis Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hearthside Homes, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1974No. 227PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, C. J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the counterclaim states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The Trustee argues that the counterclaim can be read to state one or more of three different causes of action: (1) negligence, (2) breach of contract, or (3) tortious interference with a principal-agent relationship. In our judgment the counterclaim does not state a cause of action under any of the three theories, although on re-pleading a cause of action for tortious interference with a principal-agent relationship can undoubtedly be upheld as against demurrer.

Negligence.

There is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. BekkedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lorenz v. DreskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hardscrabble Ski Area, Inc. v. First National Bank of Rice LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Schmidt v. RiessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Liebe v. City Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. Aon Risk Services, Inc. v. LiebensteinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  4. Walgreen Co. v. Sara Creek Property Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1991
  5. James W. Thomas Construction Co. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API