Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Finance Corp. v. Garlock

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 24, 1987No. 86-2095PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Wisconsin Finance Corporation (WFC), a second-mortgage assignee, appeals a summary judgment dismissing its quiet title action involving property owned by Roy and Karen Garlock and mortgaged to the United States Administrator of Veterans Affairs (VA). On appeal, WFC claims that a preceding foreclosure action purportedly extinguishing its interest in the property was void because its predecessor in interest was not properly served under sec. 180.11(2), Stats. We conclude that WFC’s predecessor was not a necessary party to the foreclosure action and therefore service was not required.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kollasch v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Stoll v. AdriansenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In the Matter of JAMES WILSON ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Appeals of METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. McDonough v. State Department of Workforce DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Salzman v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. Telemark Development, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API