Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hickman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1961No. 38900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.

This action arose out of a motor vehicle collision between a sedan driven by plaintiff in error and a tractor-trailer truck operated by the defendant in error, M. E. Hickman, through his employee, Ronald Huffman, driver of the truck. When plaintiff in error instituted the action, as plaintiff, to recover damages for personal injuries she allegedly received, and hospital and medical, expenses incurred, as a result of the accident, she named both Hickman and Huffman, as defendants; but, as she never obtained service on Huffman, our use of the designation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Tulsa Hospital Ass'n v. JubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Tuck v. BullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Demarais v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kelly v. Employers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Smith v. GizziSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. McMillan v. Lane Wood & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Wakefield v. PuckettMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Katnig v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API