Legal Opinion

Quade v. Secura Insurance

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 2011No. A10-714PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.*

Appellants David and Melynda Quade, insured under a farm insurance policy issued by respondent Secura Insurance, challenge the district court’s summary judgment dismissing their breach-of-con-traet claim. They also dispute the court’s companion decision ordering the parties to participate in the appraisal process to resolve their dispute over respondent’s obligation to pay for damage to three farm buildings. Finally, appellants claim it was error to conclude that an appraisal award would be subject to statutes governing the vacation or confirmation of arbitration…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State Farm Lloyds v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quade v. Secura InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Hull v. Motorists Ins. GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Savanna Grove Coach Homeowners' Association v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API