Legal Opinion
Caravalho v. Pugh
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1999No. 99-1001, 99-1038 and 99-1112PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered .submitted without oral argument.
In these consolidated appeals, petitioner Ernest Caravalho challenges the following three rulings of the district court: (1) the denial of Caravalho’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ha-beas corpus petition; (2) the denial of Ca-ravalho’s Motion for Judge to Voluntarily Withdraw; and (3) the denial of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan, R.L. Matthews, N.W. Smith, R.G. Simpson, E. Cave, and W.A. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Nathan H. Cohen v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Pack v. YusuffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Benito Jiminian, - V- John Nash, Warden Fci Ray BrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Tolliver v. DobreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.