Legal Opinion

In re the Grand Jury Duly Impaneled & Sworn in & for the Circuit Court

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions erom Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

ORAL OPINION.

Frear, C. J.

The appellant refused to answer a question put to him as a witness before the grand jury. For this he was found guilty of contempt by the circuit court and sentenced to imprisonment for ten days or until such time as he should purge himself of the contempt. He seeks a reversal of the judgment on exceptions, and the question is whether exceptions lie in a case of this nature.

It has been settled by former decisions that prior to the act of 1903 an appeal did not lie in a contempt case. That was held *337in Onomea Sugar Co. v. Austin, 5 Haw. 604, the court basing; its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Onomea Sugar Co. v. AustinHawaii Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ex parte Ah OiHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ex parte SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In re DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re YohoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re OxilesHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In re Mills for a Writ of Habeas CorpusHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  4. In re the Grand Jury Duly Impaneled & Sworn in & for the Circuit CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API