Legal Opinion

Ex parte Ah Oi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J. (Galbraith, J., dissenting.)

This is an appeal from an order discharging the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings on the ground that the indictment cm which he was convicted was not found by a grand jury and that the verdict upon which he was sentenced was not unanimous.

*535The prisoner had been indicted, tried, convicted and sentenced at the August Term, 1899, of the Circuit Court- of the Eirst Circuit, that is, during the period between the annexation of these islands to the United States by the Joint Resolution of Congress of July 7, 1898, and the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Grand Jury Duly Impaneled & Sworn in & for the Circuit CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Spreckels v. De BoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Ex parte PahiaHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In re Magoon ex rel. Atcherley for a Writ of Habeas CorpusHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In Re the Estate of BeckleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API