Legal Opinion

In re Mills for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, C.J.

The petitioner obtained a writ of habeas corpus April 23 for inquiry into the legality of his detention by the sheriff under a mittimus of the district court of Honolulu, which reads as follows:

“In the District Court oe Honolulu
“County oe Oahu,
“Territory oe Hawaii.
“In the matter of Contempt of Court of Harry T. Mills. Mittimus.
“The Territory oe Hawaii:
“To the High Sheriff of the Territory of Hawaii, his deputy, the Sheriff of .the County of Oahu, or his deputy:
“Harry T. Mills having been adjudged, in our District Court, of Honolulu, County of Oahu, guilty…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. People Ex Rel. Hackley v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Ex parte SeniorSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  5. People Ex Rel. Barnes v. . Court of SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re OxilesHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In re the Grand Jury Duly Impaneled & Sworn in & for the Circuit CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API