Legal Opinion

In Re Oxiles

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1926No. Nos. 1671, 1675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, C. J.

On November 18, 1925, in the circuit court of the first circuit, during the trial of the .case of the Territory of Hawaii v. Juan Oxiles, an indictment charging perjury, private counsel assisting the prosecution orally informed the court that it had just come to his attention that the defendant then on trial had tampered with one of the witnesses for the prosecution, one Lorenzo Séquito, and had thereby committed a contempt of court; and the court thereupon suggested to the prosecuting attorney that the charge of contempt against the defendant be formally…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Fisher v. McDanielWyoming Supreme Court · 1901
  5. In re BruleDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BalucanHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Re Habeas Corpus, BalucanHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API