Onomea Sugar Co. v. Austin
Hawaii Supreme Court
Appeal from Decision of Preston, J., adjudging Defendants in Contempt. Section 839, Civil Code, in regard to appeals to the full Court, held not to permit an appeal from the order of a Justice of the Supreme Court adjudging defendants in contempt. Canipbell’s Case, 2 Hawn. 27, approved. The Court declines to hear such an appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court, by
McCully, J.
A bill of complaint was brought before Mr. Justice Preston asking for an injunction against the defendants to restrain them from interfering with the Onomea Plantation till the further order of the Court, and to command them to at once deliver up to the plaintiffs all the books of account, contracts and other property of the plaintiffs. An injunction to that effect was issued October 20th, and servt d on the defendants at Hilo October 22nd. It was afterwards made to appear to the said Justice that the defendants had refused to obey the injunction entirely…
2Cited by11 opinions
- LeMay v. LeanderHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Jenkins v. MehraSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Ex parte Ah OiHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
- Collection Corp. v. AnamiHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.