Legal Opinion

Krouse v. Woodward

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1895No. 15972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. W. G. Lorigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This action was brought to recover from appellant twenty shares of stock in the defendant corporation. Plaintiff avers ownership of the stock on the twenty-fifth day of August, 1893, represented by certificate No. 7, then issued to him, and that he still owns the same; that the stock is of uncertain value; that the stock of said company has no known or fixed market value, and that plaintiff purchased said stock with a view of retaining the same for purposes of profit, investment, and speculation; that he became indebted to Woodward in the sum of four hundred dollars, for which sum Woodward…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cushman v. Thayer Manufacturing Jewelry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Adams v. MessingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Johnson v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Senter v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Atkins v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Poole v. CamdenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Nielsen v. RebardNevada Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API