Poole v. Camden
West Virginia Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Wood County. Suit by Sophie R. Poole against Sprigg D. Camden. Prom a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Lynch, Judge:
The purposes of the suit were, upon grounds alleged, to have cancelled the contract of sale and purchase by plaintiff Sophie R. Poole to defendant Camden, on January 21, 1910, of two hundred and fifty eight (258) shares of the capital stock of the Parkersburg, Marietta and Inter-Urban Railway Company, to have said shares returned to her, and an accounting by Camden of all stock and cash dividends received *312by Mm, and if he should have disposed of any or all of said stock, that he might be decreed to deliver and transfer to plaintiff an equal number of shares out of other stock…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strong v. RepideSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Oliver v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Newcomb v. BrooksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- Sweeny v. Sugar Refining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
- Keenan v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Trust Co. v. California Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Dunnett v. ArnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Sher v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Gall v. CowellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bank of Mill Creek v. Elk Horn Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.