Legal Opinion

Matter of Clark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 28, 1984No. 8425DC245PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Appellant’s principal assignment of error is that the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that he neglected his minor child within the meaning of G.S. 7A-289.32(2) and G.S. 7A-278(4), and G.S. 7A-289.32(4).

In its petition, petitioner DSS sought to terminate appellant’s parental rights under G.S. 7A-289.32(2) and G.S. 7A-289.32(4). The following conclusions of law appear in the adjudication order:

[Conclusion No. 2] That Larry Wayne Clark and Patricia Whisnant Clark, the Respondents herein, have neglected the minor child within the meaning of North Carolina General…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Matter of PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re ShepardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. In re S.N.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. In re S.C.R.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. In re S.R.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. In re J.L.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API