Matter of Pierce
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
We note preliminarily that respondents failed to make proper objections to the trial court’s findings of fact. Ordinarily, when counsel fails to except to findings of fact, they are deemed supported by competent evidence and are conclusive on appeal. Ply-Marts, Inc. v. Phileman, 40 N.C. App. 767, 768, 253 S.E. 2d 494, 495 (1979). Put otherwise, where no exceptions are taken to the findings of fact, the only question present for review is whether the findings support the conclusions of law, and it is not incumbent upon this Court to search the record in order to determine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re BiggersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Dickens v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- In Re APACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Matter of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Matter of PeirceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Matter of ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- In re A.D.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- In re T.D.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In re J.M.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- In re T.C.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.