In re S.N.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*57STEELMAN, Judge.
Where the minor children were named in the caption of the summons in a proceeding to terminate parental rights, and the children's guardian ad litem was named as a respondent and accepted service of the summons, the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court's uncontested findings of fact supported its conclusion that grounds existed for termination of respondent's parental rights based upon the minor children being willfully left in foster care for twelve months (N.C.Gen.Stat. § 7B-1111(a)(2)).
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Respondent is the mother of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- In Re YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re ShepardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- In re B.O.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- In re L.M.T.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- In re: C.M.P., C.Q.M.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- In re D.T.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- In re: Z.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.