Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Pixley v. Lodi High School District

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1899No. Sac. No. 522PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tlie Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Joseph H. Budd, Judge. • The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to exclude defendant from exercising any power as a high school district. Defendant had judgment, from which and from an order denying motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.

Appellant contends: 1. That section 1670 of the Political Code, as amended in 1895, which provides for the organization of high schools in cities, incorporated towns, and school districts having a population of one thousand inhabitants or more, violates section 1, article XIV, amendments of the national constitution, in that it deprives the taxpayer of his property without due process of law; it also…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. McCabe v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Preston v. CulbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Frederick v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Atkinson v. LorbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Evers v. HudsonMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. MacMillan Co. v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Grigsby v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API