Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Lorbeer

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1896No. L. A. No. 90PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an election contest brought under sections 1111-1127 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and presents the right to the office of marshal of the city of Pomona. Judgment was in favor of defendant, Lorbeer, who had been declared elected by the board of trustees. Plaintiff, Atkinson, appeals from the judgment upon the judgment-roll which includes findings. There is no statement or bill of exceptions. The question presented is whether or not the entire vote of the second ward of said city at the election involved here should be rejected. At that ward respondent received a majority of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Russell v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Knowles v. YeatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Whipley v. McKuneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rideout v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Lee v. PrewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kenworthy v. MastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People ex rel. Pixley v. Lodi High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Packwood v. BrownellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API