Flagiello v. Crilly
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Bell,
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. It is hornbook law that a judgment of nonsuit can be entered only in clear cases and plaintiff must be giren the benefit of all eridence farorable to him, together with all reasonable inferences of fact arising therefrom, and any conflict in the eridence must be resolred in his faror: Castelli v. Pittsburgh Railways Company, 402 Pa. 135, 165 A. 2d 632; Stimac v. Barkey, 405 Pa. 253, 174 A. 2d 868; Borzik v. Miller, 399 Pa. 293, 159 A. 2d 741.
The law is likewise clear that the plaintiff has the burden of proring by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Ebersole v. BeistlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Schofield v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Stimac v. BarkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Cuthbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Francis C. O'Neill and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States v. Ambrose-Augusterfer Corporation, Third-Party Francis C. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Simmons v. MullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Yohe v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.