Bird & Sons, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION
COWEN, Chief Judge.
This case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff’s petition states claims sounding primarily in tort, and the court is thus without jurisdiction to grant relief; that, assuming plaintiff’s claims are cognizable by this court, the claims were redressable under the contract, and plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies provided for in the contract; and that by “electing” to pursue its remedies under the Foreign Claims Act [10 U.S.C. § 2734 (1964), as amended (Supp. IV,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- SGS-92-X003 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.