Legal Opinion

Limited v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 25, 2016No. 16 C 2988; No. 16 C 3956; No. 16 C 4876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs, three manufacturers of generic drugs, are seeking a declaratory judgment, which they believe would give them the green light to produce a generic form of Defendants’ popular blood pressure medicine, Benicar® (olmesartan medoxom-il), at the earliest possible date. As explained here, however, this court lacks jurisdiction over Defendants. Accordingly, the case is dismissed without prejudice.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (“DS Japan”), a Japanese pharmaceutical company, owns certain patents,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. ex rel. Martin-Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. uBID, Inc. v. GoDaddy Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Monkton Ins Services, Limited v. William RitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Al Haj v. Pfizer IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API