Limited v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs, three manufacturers of generic drugs, are seeking a declaratory judgment, which they believe would give them the green light to produce a generic form of Defendants’ popular blood pressure medicine, Benicar® (olmesartan medoxom-il), at the earliest possible date. As explained here, however, this court lacks jurisdiction over Defendants. Accordingly, the case is dismissed without prejudice.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (“DS Japan”), a Japanese pharmaceutical company, owns certain patents,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. ex rel. Martin-Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- uBID, Inc. v. GoDaddy Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Monkton Ins Services, Limited v. William RitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Al Haj v. Pfizer IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018