Legal Opinion

Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 13, 2018No. 1:17-cv-06730Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KARMEL AL HAJ and TIMOTHY A. WOODHAMS, ) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) 17 C 6730 Plaintiffs, ) ) Judge Gary Feinerman vs. ) ) PFIZER INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On behalf of themselves and a putative nationwide class, Karmel Al Haj and Timothy Woodhams allege in this diversity suit that Pfizer Inc., which markets and distributes Robitussin cough syrup, deceives consumers by charging more for “Maximum Strength” Robitussin even though it contains a lower…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API