Legal Opinion

Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided April 13, 2018No. 17 C 6730PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge

On behalf of themselves and a putative nationwide class, Karmel Al Haj and Timothy Woodhams allege in this diversity suit that Pfizer Inc., which markets and distributes Robitussin cough syrup, deceives consumers by charging more for "Maximum Strength" Robitussin even though it contains a lower concentration of one of its two active ingredients than does "Regular Strength" Robitussin. Doc. 1. Pfizer moves to dismiss Woodhams's claims for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), to dismiss Al Haj's claims under…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Al Haj v. Pfizer IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  3. Al Haj v. Pfizer IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Coyote Logistics LLC v. Advance Trucking Solutions Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Flaherty v. Clinique Laboratories LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API