Legal Opinion

Regoli v. Fancher

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1937No. Civ. 10457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an action to quiet title. The plaintiff framed his complaint in two counts. The defendants appeared and answered both counts and at the same time filed a cross-complaint. The plaintiff answered the cross-complaint and the trial was had on all of the issues made by said pleadings. Having heard all of the evidence the trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and from the judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed.

Both parties claim title under mesne conveyances from N. Forsman and wife, who were formerly the owners of the property. We will first discuss the case as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tiffany & Co. v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Regoli v. FancherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API