Legal Opinion

Regoli v. Fancher

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1934No. S. F. 14808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This record presents reciprocal actions to quiet title to a residence lot in Oakland. Issues were joined on both complaint and cross-complaint. Defendant C. R. Fancher having died prior to trial, his widow Dorothy IT. Faneher, as administratrix of his estate, was substituted in his place as defendant and cross-complainant. Plaintiff was denied relief and said administratrix had judgment quieting her title against plaintiff. Defendants D. H. and Kate Duncanson were declared bona fide encumbrancers of said property under the title of said defendant.

Both parties deraigned title from common…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Rathman v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HorvathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Coates Capitol Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Knipe v. BarkdullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Rackers v. NicholsonArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Regoli v. FancherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API