Bancroft v. Bancroft
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
A demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained, and, plaintiff declining to further amend, judgment was rendered for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals. The complaint is substantially as follows: Defendant is the uncle of plaintiff, and ever since the latter’s boyhood plaintiff was under the control and direction of defendant, and in his employ, and a part of the time resided with him. Defendant was accustomed in a great measure to guide and direct plaintiff’s actions in business and other matters; was tyrannical and overbearing, and impatient of opposition; and thus had and retained…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Campbell v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Shevlin v. ShevlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Reay v. ReayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- In Re Estate of HumeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.