Heaphy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
State Farm and Denise Heaphy could not resolve their dispute over whether State Farm had fully compensated Heaphy under her underinsured motorists (UIM) coverage for her property damage. In addition to her repair bill, Heaphy claimed a loss for the diminished value of the vehicle. Conceding that diminished value is covered under Heaphy’s policy, State Farm sought arbitration. The trial court found that the dispute focused on coverage and, accordingly, refused to order arbitration. Because State Farm has conceded coverage, we reverse and remand for the trial court to order arbitration.
FACTS
An…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- McGreevy v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Walters v. A.A.A. Waterproofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.