Legal Opinion

Scott v. Cingular Wireless

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2007No. 77406-4PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*847¶1 The plaintiffs below filed a class action suit against Cingular Wireless alleging that Cingular had overcharged consumers between $1 and around $45 per month by unlawfully adding roaming and hidden charges. The trial court entered an order compelling individual arbitration based on an arbitration clause in Cingular’s standard subscriber contracts. That arbitration clause contained a provision prohibiting class action litigation or arbitration. Plaintiffs contend that class action waiver is unconscionable and unenforceable.

Chambers, J.

¶2 We took direct review1 and conclude that the class…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. McKee v. AT&T Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API