Legal Opinion
Martone v. Lensink
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1988No. 13328PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
This appeal concerns the legal consequences that General Statutes § 4-1811 attaches to an agency’s ex parte submission of documents to an administrative hearing officer. The plaintiff, Mark Mar-tone, appeals from the Superior Court’s denial of his administrative appeal from the hearing officer’s decision affirming the proposal of the defendant, Brian Len-sink, commissioner of mental retardation, to transfer the plaintiff from one group home to another. We find error and remand for further proceedings.
The record discloses the following history: At the time the defendant decided upon the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Hapag-Lloyd A. G., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Blaker v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- City of West Haven v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.