Legal Opinion
Coble v. Maloney
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 14, 1994No. 11780PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendants1 Archie & Frankie’s, Inc., and Vincent Howe (The Pub Cafe)2 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury verdict, in favor of the plaintiff, Marvin Coble, on one count of wilful, wanton and reckless misconduct, and on one count of violation of General Statutes § 30-102 *657(Dram Shop Act).3 On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) denied the defendants’ motion in limine to preclude the introduction of evidence of codefendant Brian Maloney’s blood alcohol level unless accompanied by expert testimony, (2) admitted the out-of-court…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pizza Connection, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. NievesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Lupoli v. LupoliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Oliver Bishop, III and Oliver Bishop, IV v. National Health Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.