Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of San Bruno

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1963No. Civ. 20052PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

City of San Bruno and certain of its officers appeal from a judgment which (1) declares Ordinance No. 822, passed in pursuance of a master plan which zones all of the land within the city, to be invalid, void and of no effect insofar as it applies to the westerly 77 acres of plaintiffs’ property; (2) declares that earlier zoning ordinances are in full force and effect; (3) enjoins the city and its officers, employees and agents from enforcing the ordinance against the 77 acres; and (4) perpetually enjoins and re strains the city from rezoning the 77 acres to administrative-research or light…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Johnston v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. City of Sausalito v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Taschner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Manning v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API