Legal Opinion
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Abrams
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1988PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Wachtler.
The petitioners — four brewers, several beer wholesalers and a beer wholesalers’ trade association — brought these proceedings to quash subpoenas duces tecum and interrogatories served upon them by the Attorney-General pursuant to an investigation into marketing practices in the beer industry which the Attorney-General alleges may violate the State’s antitrust laws. The central issue posed by this appeal, here by leave of the Appellate Division,1 is whether that court properly granted the applications on the ground that the focus of the investigation…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hellerstein v. Assessor of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Sperry v. Crompton Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kapon v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Re-Alco Industries, Inc. v. National Center for Health Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Leider v. RalfeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.