Legal Opinion
Kick v. Regan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 4, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), having decided that each operator’s license would bear the photograph of the licensee, issued a request for proposal (RFP) for a photographic driver’s license central issuance system. DMV chose the central issuance system, rather than the over-the-counter method (self-processing film), primarily for security purposes. Its first effort was aborted when the Legislature failed to provide the necessary funds. In November 1980, DMV issued a second RFP. The State reserved the right to negotiate a contract considering price and other factors. Only…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albert Elia Building Co. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- General Building Contractors of New York State, Inc. v. County of OneidaNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Transactive Corp. v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- North Atlantic Utilities, Inc. v. Keyspan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lancaster Development, Inc. v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Lancaster Development, Inc. v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013