Legal Opinion
Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reid S. Moule (90 AD2d 332). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer concur; Judge Simons taking no part.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Atlantic-Inland, Inc. v. Town of UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Kick v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Wasilkowski v. Amsterdam Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.