Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Parks Rapids v. Pray

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1927No. Docket No. 6015PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

P laintiff brought this action to recover from defendant upon a written contract of guaranty, as will more fully appear hereinafter. In the court below judgment went for defendant, and thereafter a motion for a new trial interposed by plaintiff was denied. Plaintiff appeals.

The only question before us relates to the application of section 360 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that no acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, by which to take the case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, unless the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Clunin v. First Federal Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sterling v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Foristiere v. AlongeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Heiser v. McAlpineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API