Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1942No. Civ. 13339PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment in an action against defendant executor upon a rejected claim. Judgment went for defendant upon the ground that the promissory note which was the subject of the action was barred by the provisions of section 337, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure and sections 700, 702, and 707 of the Probate Code. The first section relates to the time for commencement of actions, the latter sections to the time for presentation of claims.

Plaintiff holds a note executed by decedent April 6, 1932, for $10,000; it was due March 16, 1933, and would have…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API