Legal Opinion

Foristiere v. Alonge

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1929No. Docket No. 6538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant Paolo Alongé appeals from an adverse judgment in an action to quiet title, the real purpose of which was to cancel a mortgage standing of record against the property in defendant’s name, and which the plaintiff Foristiere claimed was barred by the statute of limitations at the time he acquired the property.

It appears that plaintiff’s predecessors in interest, Santo Catania and wife, during their ownership of the property, encumbered the same with two mortgages, the first of which was given to the Bank of Italy. The second ’ was given to the defendant Alongé to secure…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Pacific States Corporation v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Collins v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Heiser v. McAlpineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API