Robinson v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The applicable rule, well established, is stated by Ervin, J., in Proctor v. Highway Commission, 230 N.C. 687, 691, 55 S.E. 2d 479, as follows: “Where only a part of a tract of land is appropriated by the State Highway and Public Works Commission for highway purposes, the measure of damages in such proceeding is the difference between the fair market value of the entire tract immediately before the taking and the fair market value of what is left immediately after the taking. The items going to make up this difference embrace compensation for the part taken and compensation for injury to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State Highway & Public Works Commission v. HartleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Gallimore v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Kirkman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Templeton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Williams v. STATE HIGHWAY COM. OF NORTH CAROLINASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.