State v. Sjogren
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant appeals from his convictions for Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle, ORS 164.135, and Robbery in the Second Degree, ORS 164.405. Although both convictions arose out of the same criminal escapade, it consisted of two distinct parts or episodes. Both episodes occurred during the afternoon and evening of the same day. Defendant assigns as error the court’s admission, over objection, of the evidence of the other episode in each trial. He was tried separately on each charge. The cases were consolidated on appeal.
The essential facts are:
Defendant and Gary Kinnaman met in a bar in Tillamook.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. HockingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. LehmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. HockingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Youngblood v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. HarshmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. HoltermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.