State v. Huffman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Defendant was charged with perjury and conspiracy to commit perjury. He was found guilty of both charges by a jury; however, the court “merged” the conviction for conspiracy with the perjury conviction. Defendant appeals only the perjury conviction, asserting that prosecutorial misconduct requires dismissal and that erroneously admitted evidence justifies a new trial. We affirm.
We take the following facts primarily from the pretrial hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The conspiracy count alleged that defendant, James Huffman, defendant’s nephew, and James’ wife Claudia conspired to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. VentrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Schwartzmiller v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.