Legal Opinion

State v. Hockings

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 1975No. C 74-04-0993 CrPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant was convicted of four counts of murder. ORS 163.115. He appeals contending that the trial court erred: (1) in admitting evidence of a prior criminal trespass; ① (2) in refusing to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the state intentionally destroyed fingerprint evidence found at the scene of the crime; (3) in denying defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal; and (4) in instructing on felony murder.

We first consider the alleged error in admitting evidence of defendant’s prior crime. At trial it was the state’s theory that defendant was burglarizing the victims’ home and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. ZimmerleeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ArthurSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. State v. MichenerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. State v. HockingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. People v. HedrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API