Legal Opinion

State v. Harshman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 1983No. 6170, 6173, 6174, 6180 and 6785 CA A23239 (Control), CA A23240PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*713YOUNG, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions, after a jury trial, for delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). The charges arose out of the possession of nine pills and their delivery to an undercover informant on April 13, 1981. He assigns as error the admission of evidence of “other crimes”; the failure to grant a continuance or alternatively to exclude the other crimes evidence because of claimed pretrial discovery violations of ORS 135.805, et seq; the failure to merge the two convictions; and the revocation of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. HockingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. MadisonOregon Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. BegisheCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. State v. HerveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. NistlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API