Legal Opinion
Village of Oregon v. Bryant
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1994No. 92-0104, 92-0574-CR, 92-0575PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.
On these consolidated appeals from three separate cases the court of appeals, relying on its own precedents, decided that none of the defendants had been misinformed about his right to a second test for blood alcohol content under the Implied Consent Law, sec. 343.305, Stats. Hence, there was no denial of due process. Accordingly, the court of appeals, in an unpublished opinion dated September 30, 1993, reversed the order to suppress intoxilyzer test results in State v. Branton and reversed the judgment and order in City of Madison v. Kopp, and it affirmed the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Court of Appeals of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. PiskulaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- City of Mequon v. HessCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. MuenteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. PiddingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- County of Ozaukee v. QuelleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Kurecka v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. PiddingtonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.