Legal Opinion

State v. Piddington

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 27, 2000No. 99-1250-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

¶ 1. The State appeals an order suppressing the results of a blood test for alcohol concentration to which Michael Piddington submitted after his arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court ordered the test results suppressed after concluding that Piddington, who is hearing impaired, "needed an American Sign Language interpreter to really understand the information he was being given" under Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) (1995-96). The State argues that the arresting officer complied with the informed consent law when he orally informed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. BohlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Scales v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PiddingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. State v. PiddingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. Walter L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API