Legal Opinion

County of Ozaukee v. Quelle

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 22, 1995No. 95-1074PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Nancy L. Quelle pled no contest to a charge of operating her vehicle while intoxicated. She now argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress the results of her breath alcohol test because the arresting officer did not accurately or completely inform her about Wisconsin's implied consent law. She asserts she was subjectively confused by the officer's conduct. She argues that while a "subjective confusion" defense has not to this point been judicially recognized in Wisconsin, its viability was acknowledged by our supreme court in Village of Oregon v. Bryant, 188 Wis. 2d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Barrera v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. County of Racine v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Village of Oregon v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. PiddingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. FaustWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. Dawn M. PradoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Washburn County v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API