Legal Opinion

Anglin v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 12, 2001No. 93 C 3438PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court are both parties’ motions in limine. For the following reasons, this Court grants Defendant’s motion in limine to bar Plaintiffs expert witness from testifying; grants Defendant’s motion in limine to bar Plaintiff from presenting undisclosed witnesses at trial; grants in part and denies in part Defendant’s motion in limine to bar evidence and argument relating to the Plaintiffs claims for “lost opportunity” damages; and denies Defendant’s motion in limine to bar Plaintiff from presenting lay opinions of whether…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Roderick LA MONTAGNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN CONVENIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Casares v. BernalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Wielgus v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. Smith v. Huntington Ingalls Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019
  4. Ammons v. Chicago Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Brama v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API