Legal Opinion
Smith v. Huntington Ingalls Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided January 30, 2019No. CIVIL NO. 1:16cv406-HSO-JCGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated's Motion [67] for Summary Judgment. This Motion is fully briefed. After review of the Motion, the Response, the related pleadings, the *713record as a whole, and relevant legal authority, the Court finds that Defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated's Motion [67] should be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Relevant facts
The dispute in this case is whether Defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated ("Ingalls") wrongfully terminated Plaintiff Charles Philip Smith ("Smith") for what Ingalls claims…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Hamilton v. Segue Software Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michael McIntyre v. Calsonic Kansei N Amer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Cherry v. Huntington Ingalls IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019
- Michael McIntyre v. Calsonic Kansei N Amer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020