Legal Opinion

Brama v. Target Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 25, 2019No. 1:14-cv-06098Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINE BRAMA, ) ) No. 14 CV 6098 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim ) TARGET CORPORATION, ) ) October 25, 2019 Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Plaintiff Christine Brama claims that Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”) is liable for personal injuries she sustained in August 2012 after she allegedly slipped and fell on a foreign substance near the entrance of a Target store. Before the court are Target’s motions in limine Nos. 1-20. Brama opposes all 20 motions. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Barbara R. Jonasson, Jeanne Norgren, Patricia Twohill v. Lutheran Child and Family Services, Doing Business as Lutherbrook Children's Center SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API