State v. Beaty
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT,-Judge.
Appellant challénges the duration of his sentence first imposed at a probation-revocation hearing, arguing that the district court, by vacating the stay of imposition and imposing and executing a sentence that is an upward durational departure from the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, violated appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial as recognized in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We reverse appellant’s sentence and remand this matter to the district court for reconsideration of the sentence in light of the new rule…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State of Minnesota v. S. A. M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006