Moffitt v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
This is a postconviction proceeding raising the issue of the legality of the imposition of a prison term to run consecutively to a previously imposed but unexecuted sentence for an earlier offense.
Petitioner plead guilty in 1978 to burglary, and the trial court imposed a 5-year prison term, with the term to run consecutively to a previously imposed but unexe-cuted sentence of 5 years for a 1976 burglary. After the sentencing judge imposed the 5-year consecutive term, a different judge vacated the stay of execution of the previously imposed sentence.
Petitioner’s argument is that…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DulskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MeechCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. IsaacsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.