State v. Petersen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to correct or vacate a sentence. We also review the propriety of an order discharging a writ of habeas corpus. This issue presented is whether a state sentence following a burglary conviction, imposed after appellant had pleaded guilty to a separate Federal crime but before the Federal sentence was imposed, should run concurrently with or consecutively to the Federal sentence. The district court held that the failure of the state trial judge to specify that the *479state sentence should run concurrently with the Federal sentence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Ex Parte Ralph LawsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- People Ex Rel. Hesley v. RagenIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Ex Parte SpearsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
- State v. AzzoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Pearson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- People v. AlbaNew York Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.